From 179eb696191958bae891916eec2708c4d3e34983 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 09:22:39 +0200
Subject: Fix UPDATE statement for smart containers with read-only value
 members

Here we have to include them (think what happens when we erase an element
somewhere in the middle of a container).
---
 common/container/change-tracking/driver.cxx | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

(limited to 'common/container/change-tracking/driver.cxx')

diff --git a/common/container/change-tracking/driver.cxx b/common/container/change-tracking/driver.cxx
index 78f7a7f..9baf6a2 100644
--- a/common/container/change-tracking/driver.cxx
+++ b/common/container/change-tracking/driver.cxx
@@ -699,6 +699,34 @@ main (int argc, char* argv[])
         t.commit ();
       }
     }
+
+    // Test read-only values.
+    {
+      ro_object o (1);
+      o.v.push_back (ro_value (1, 1));
+      o.v.push_back (ro_value (2, 2));
+      o.v.push_back (ro_value (3, 3));
+
+      {
+        transaction t (db->begin ());
+        db->persist (o);
+        t.commit ();
+      }
+
+      o.v.erase (o.v.begin ());
+
+      {
+        transaction t (db->begin ());
+        db->update (o);
+        t.commit ();
+      }
+
+      {
+        transaction t (db->begin ());
+        assert (db->load<ro_object> (1)->v == o.v);
+        t.commit ();
+      }
+    }
   }
   catch (const odb::exception& e)
   {
-- 
cgit v1.1